Corporate Governance at Royal Bank of Canada
|
|
ICMR HOME | Case Studies Collection
Case Details:
Case Code : CGOX009
Case Length : 18 Pages
Period : 2004
Pub Date : 2004
Teaching Note :Not Available Organization : Royal Bank of Canada
Industry : Financial Services Countries : Canada
To download Corporate Governance at Royal Bank of Canada case study
(Case Code: CGOX009) click on the button below, and select the case from the list of available cases:
Price:
For delivery in electronic format: Rs. 300 ; For delivery through courier (within India): Rs. 300 + Rs. 25 for Shipping & Handling Charges
»
Corporate Governance Case Studies
» Short Case Studies
» View Detailed Pricing Info
» How To Order This Case » Business Case Studies » Area Specific Case Studies
» Industry Wise Case Studies
» Company Wise Case Studies
Please note:
This case study was compiled from published sources, and is intended to be used as a basis for class discussion. It is not intended to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a management situation. Nor is it a primary information source.
|
<< Previous
Transparency impacts everything from strategy to culture, as well as a corporation's relationship with its various stakeholders. The Naked Corporation is a breakthrough - a timely and excellent perspective on successfully operating in today's open environment.1
-Gordon M. Nixon, Chairman & CEO, RBC Financial Group2.
Introduction
Royal Bank of Canada (RBC), headquartered in Toronto, Ontario, was the largest financial services group in Canada. In 2003, it ranked #337 in the Fortune Global 500 and #80 in Forbes Global 2000 and had a market capitalization of C$41.6 billion and an asset base of C$413 billion.3 ($ 1.0 = C$ 1.31108)
On 26th November 2003, RBC received the Overall Award of Excellence for corporate reporting at the CICA4. The Judging panels5 presented RBC with top scores in four categories: 1) Annual Reporting, 2) Corporate Governance Disclosure, 3) Electronic Disclosure and 4) Sustainable Development Reporting.6
|
|
In August 20037, the Canadian Business magazine ranked RBC as the second best board8 in Canada. RBC had been ranked No.1 in 2001. RBC had adopted what observers considered many best practices in corporate governance. RBC's directors (in 2001) had to hold at least $100,000 in stock and had to stand for re-election every year.
|
Any re-pricing of the stock options was not approved. The board published the attendance of each director at the Board and Committee meetings. The bank also scored high grades on the 'independence' of its directors. Out of the 19 directors standing for election, in 2002, only one director represented the bank's management. RBC had also decided to split the offices of the CEO and the Chairman.9
In 2001, had launched a Subsidiary Governance Office (SGO) in order to enhance governance practices in its subsidiaries. It installed sophisticated software that allowed quick and easy access to up-to-date information on all parts of its global network... |
Excerpts
>>
|
|